<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Medium vs. Platform &#8211; Lunch with Jim Brady</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chcameron.com/2009/04/02/medium-vs-platform-lunch-with-jim-brady/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chcameron.com/2009/04/02/medium-vs-platform-lunch-with-jim-brady/</link>
	<description>The blog and homepage of Chris Cameron</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:48:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter as broadcast: What #newtwitter might mean for networked journalism » Nieman Journalism Lab</title>
		<link>http://chcameron.com/2009/04/02/medium-vs-platform-lunch-with-jim-brady/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter as broadcast: What #newtwitter might mean for networked journalism » Nieman Journalism Lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chcameron.com/?p=622#comment-192</guid>
		<description>[...] to emphasize its emptiness, its invitingness, its agnosticism. More properly, though, Twitter is a medium, with all the McLuhanesque implications that term suggests. The architecture of Twitter as an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to emphasize its emptiness, its invitingness, its agnosticism. More properly, though, Twitter is a medium, with all the McLuhanesque implications that term suggests. The architecture of Twitter as an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

